Enter anti-fraud claims screening

The anti-fraud layer is what turns Enter from a drafting tool into a claims defense system that can actually save money for large Brazilian defendants. In Brazil, the problem is not just answering lawsuits faster. It is filtering out weak, duplicated, and manipulated claims before they force settlements or outside counsel work. Enter plugs court records into company evidence, then checks whether the plaintiff, lawyer, documents, and filing pattern look real and procedurally valid.

• This is tightly matched to how Brazilian mass litigation works in practice. Enter is built for banks, airlines, insurers, and fintechs handling tens of thousands of cases, and it runs more than 30 checks such as forged address proof, invalid powers of attorney, deceased plaintiffs, irregular lawyer records, and repeat use of the same documents across many suits.
  1 sacra
• The market signal is that abusive litigation has become important enough for the judiciary itself to organize around it. CNJ approved Recommendation 159 in October 2024 to help courts identify, prevent, and treat abusive litigation, and later published a national diagnosis on predatory and abusive litigation in December 2025.
  3 jus 4 jus
• This also explains Enter's moat. A global legal AI product can help write memos, but Enter has to know Brazilian court workflows, local fraud patterns, enterprise evidence systems, and lawyer validation rails well enough to catch bad filings at intake. That kind of localization makes the product stickier and harder to copy quickly.
  1 sacra 5 oab

Going forward, the highest value in this category will move upstream from response drafting to claim screening and prevention. The vendors that win large enterprise accounts in Brazil will be the ones that can show not just faster filings, but fewer payouts, fewer abusive cases reaching counsel, and better control over the full litigation book.