Vanta Continuous Controls Across Frameworks

Diving deeper into

Christina Cacioppo, CEO of Vanta, on the value of SOC 2 compliance for startups

Interview
There is a lot of overlap in the actual security work required to obtain each standard
Analyzed 3 sources

Vanta’s recurring value comes from turning one time audit prep into a live control system that keeps working after the certificate is issued. The same checks that help a company pass SOC 2 also keep watching for drift, like new employees missing two factor auth or systems falling out of policy, and that same evidence can be remapped into ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, and security reviews without starting over each time.

  • The product sits in the customer’s stack and pulls data from cloud apps, code repos, HR systems, and employee devices, then tests whether controls are actually in place. That makes renewal a recurring workflow, not a one off consulting project, because auditors want current proof with valid dates.
  • The overlap across frameworks is what makes expansion efficient. A control like multi factor auth, encryption, or access review is the same underlying work, it just maps into different audit formats. That lets Vanta sell another framework with much less extra implementation work for the customer.
  • The broader category is moving from audit prep into continuous trust management. Laika describes the same model as living and breathing compliance, and Vanta has pushed further into trust reports, vendor monitoring, and pen testing to raise usage frequency and increase revenue per customer beyond an annual audit cycle.

This is heading toward a broader security operating layer, where compliance is the wedge and continuous monitoring is the product that sticks. The winners will be the platforms that start with shared controls, then keep adding adjacent workflows that security teams and revenue teams use all year, not just before an audit.