Reducing India's ESOP Trust Deficit

Diving deeper into

Kashish Sharma, CEO of EquityList on building Carta of India

Interview
reduce that trust deficit in the ecosystem.
Analyzed 3 sources

This is really a compensation trust problem disguised as a paperwork problem. In India, many employees treat ESOPs as close to worthless because they cannot translate a grant into rupees, timing, taxes, or real upside, and many startups still manage equity through spreadsheets, verbal promises, or incomplete grant workflows. EquityList is trying to turn equity from a vague promise into a visible, signed, modeled financial offer that both employee and company can point to.

  • The gap starts with basic legibility. Many Indian startups still use Excel and outsource equity ops to CAs, CS firms, or lawyers, and even later stage companies can lack board approved ESOP schemes or signed grant documents. That creates room for confusion long before any liquidity event happens.
  • The offer portal matters because it puts the missing numbers on one screen. Instead of hearing 0.2% and guessing, a candidate can see strike price, current valuation context, upside and downside scenarios, and accept the grant in the same workflow. That is closer to how cash compensation is explained, which makes equity feel real.
  • There is a useful contrast with the US. In mature markets, cap table software became the system of record that later enabled tenders, secondaries, and tax workflows. But those products only work if users trust the platform with sensitive ownership data and believe it is acting for them, not against them.

The next step is that trust moves from explanation into action. As more Indian startups standardize grants, buybacks, and employee communications on a single system, equity can become a stronger hiring and retention tool, and the platform that becomes the trusted record for grants first is best positioned to layer on liquidity, compliance, and broader company operating workflows later.