Network Effects Need Native Products
Diving deeper into
Bob Moore, CEO and co-founder of Crossbeam, on ecosystem-led growth
network effects as a growth strategy are really difficult to bolt on to an existing company or business model
Analyzed 7 sources
Reviewing context
This only works when the product gets better as each new participant joins, not when a company tries to tape a sharing feature onto a standalone SaaS tool. Crossbeam’s core job is to show two companies where they share customers, prospects, and partners, with controls over exactly what each side can see. Every added company makes that matching graph more useful, which is why the network is the product, not a plugin.
-
Crossbeam was built around the cold start problem from day one. It first won partner teams, then spread the data into sales and go to market workflows. That sequencing mattered because partner teams control the cross company data connections that make the graph possible.
-
This is different from Dropbox style virality. Dropbox used referrals to acquire users, but the storage product still worked alone. In Crossbeam, the value a customer gets depends directly on how many relevant companies are in the network and sharing overlap data.
-
The closest analogue is an ecosystem company like Klaviyo on Shopify. Klaviyo benefited from a large partner ecosystem and distribution channel, but its email product was still usable without the whole network participating. Crossbeam is tighter coupled, because the shared graph itself is the asset.
The next step is more software being built on top of this shared business graph. As more companies connect CRM and warehouse data, Crossbeam can become less like a partner tool and more like infrastructure for co selling, co marketing, and account selection across the broader B2B revenue stack.