Onboarding and workflow drive adoption
Director of Innovation at large law firm on why firms adopt Harvey over Legora
In large law firms, the sale is really a change management project disguised as software procurement. A polished demo is table stakes, but the vendors that stand out are the ones that show they understand the real work starts after signature, with practice by practice training, one-on-one support, security review, partner buy-in, and careful license management. That matters because firms usually begin with five to 20 seats, not a firmwide rollout, and expand only if usage becomes habitual.
-
Large firms evaluate broad legal AI tools with innovation, IT, knowledge management, e-discovery, procurement, and security teams involved, and the process often takes around six months. A vendor that leads with onboarding signals it understands that adoption is gated by internal process, not just product quality.
-
The best vendors also help the buyer sell the tool internally. In practice that means training associates who do the day to day work, giving partners enough confidence to champion the tool, sharing updates quickly, and providing usage data so underused seats can be reassigned instead of going idle.
-
This is a key difference between top-down platforms like Harvey and Legora, and workflow-embedded tools like Spellbook. The more a product fits into the lawyer's existing workflow, such as inside Microsoft Word, the less onboarding friction it creates and the easier it is to grow from a small foothold.
Going forward, legal AI vendors will win less on headline features and more on deployment muscle. The companies that combine strong onboarding, tight workflow fit, and flexible small scale licensing will keep compounding seat growth inside firms, while vendors that sell as if a law firm is a fast enterprise software rollout will stall after the demo.