Four metrics for late-stage secondaries
Hari Raghavan, ex-COO of Forge, on late-stage investing and facilitating secondary sales
The key implication is that late stage secondary investing is often a pattern recognition problem, not an information hoarding problem. Once a company is mature, the main question is whether the business engine is still working. Revenue shows scale, growth rate shows demand, gross margin shows whether the product has real economic value, and runway shows how much time management has before it must raise or cut. That is usually enough to sort strong compounders from weak stories, even without a full data room.
-
This is very different from seed investing. Early on, investors are mostly judging team, product, and market because there is little operating history. In late stage deals, the bet shifts toward repeatable traction, which makes a short metric set much more useful.
-
Secondary buyers are usually purchasing common stock from employees or early investors, often with fewer protections than preferred shares. That makes simplicity even more important. Buyers need a fast screen for whether the business is strong enough to overcome structure, liquidity, and pricing risk.
-
The market structure reinforces this 80 20 approach. Most private share trading still happens through fragmented broker and platform workflows, where perfect information is rare. Investors who insist on near total certainty will see fewer deals, while diversified buyers can underwrite more opportunities with directional confidence.
As private companies stay private longer and disclose more in periodic tenders, direct listings, and secondary programs, this lightweight underwriting playbook will matter even more. The winning investors will be the ones that can turn a few core signals into many disciplined decisions, then let diversification do the rest.