Carta Cap Table Advantage
Carta and the future of liquidity
The main takeaway is that broker style revenue in private market secondaries looks large per deal, but it is too small and too lumpy to justify a venture scale valuation on its own. Twenty to 30 deals for $50 million means each trade is huge, bespoke, and hard to repeat. That is attractive for a sales team, but weak as the foundation for a compounding software business. Carta’s stronger model is recurring cap table and fund admin revenue, with liquidity as an adjacent workflow, not the core engine.
-
Private secondaries have historically been broker heavy, with high fees and manual matching, but the software layer is still thin. Earlier work estimated roughly $30 billion of annual private share volume versus a much larger pool of locked equity, which is why commissions can look tempting even when the market is not yet deep enough to support durable platform scale.
-
Tender offers and one off liquidity programs are real businesses, but they are episodic and operationally heavy. Carta’s own liquidity tools were described as capable of generating billions in transaction volume, yet tender events often take months to organize, depend on issuer approval, and produce uneven price discovery, which limits how predictable the revenue stream becomes.
-
That is why the more strategic asset is control of the record keeping layer. Carta manages cap tables, valuations, and share transfers for a large share of venture backed companies, which lets it monetize the everyday workflow around equity. In that framing, brokering a trade is a feature, while being the system where every share already lives is the business with compounding economics.
Going forward, the winning private market companies are likely to look less like high commission brokers and more like infrastructure providers that make liquidity cheaper, safer, and more routine. That shifts value toward systems of record, transfer rails, and recurring compliance workflows. It also means future growth will come from making many more transactions possible, not from squeezing more fees out of a few large ones.