Webinars as Evergreen Sales Assets

Diving deeper into

Shanna Leonardi, content manager at EditShare, on the webinar engagement process

Interview
I think, having a webinar just to have a webinar is a waste of time.
Analyzed 5 sources

This is really a point about distribution efficiency, not event cadence. At EditShare, the winning webinar is the one that turns a product story into a reusable asset that keeps pulling in prospects after the live slot ends. The interview makes that concrete, live attendance is small, post event viewing is far larger, and the team increasingly cares less about signups and more about whether someone reaches out after watching.

  • The workflow already treats the live event as the start, not the finish. EditShare runs the event in Zoom because registration pages, reminders, polls, quizzes, and backstage production are easier out of the box, then moves the recording into Wistia for blog embedding and gated on demand viewing.
  • The clearest proof is the viewing pattern. EditShare sees roughly 10 times as much engagement after the event as during the live session, and only about 30% of registrants for product webinars show up live. That makes topic selection and replay usability more important than filling a monthly slot.
  • This matches a broader shift in webinar software. Wistia has built features like chapters and pre recorded webinars around asynchronous viewing, while Zoom emphasizes branded registration, reminders, backstage, and simulive. The market is splitting between tools for running the event and tools for getting more value from the recording.

Going forward, webinar programs will look more like content production lines. The strongest teams will publish fewer sessions, center them on real product questions, package the recordings for easy navigation, and judge success by downstream sales conversations. That favors vendors that connect live production, repurposing, and marketing automation in one smooth workflow.