Stablecoin Market Splits by Function
Kevin Kang, co-founder of Reap, on stablecoin-native business models in fintech
The market is more likely to split by function than by country, because stablecoin rails let the same provider serve Brazil, Singapore, and Nigeria through one software and liquidity stack. In practice, the hard part is not planting flags geography by geography. It is owning a specific job in the flow, like moving funds, issuing cards, converting between fiat and stablecoins, or adding lending and savings on top.
-
Reap describes its own lane as money in motion, not a full stack bank. Its customers use the same underlying stablecoin ledger to power neobank cards, supplier payouts, payroll, and wallet transfers across multiple regions, which argues against a country by country market map.
-
Other infrastructure players are carving the market the same way. Rain started with card and authorization infrastructure, Layer2 focused on cross border payment plumbing, and both describe demand as coming from users who want faster settlement and simpler on and off ramps rather than a local champion in each market.
-
The strongest proof that geography is not the main divider is that incumbents are folding stablecoins into global rails. Stripe completed its Bridge acquisition in February 2025, and Visa expanded USDC settlement in the US in December 2025, showing the winning wedge is product capability that can travel across markets.
Over the next few years, winners are likely to be the companies that become default infrastructure for one layer of the stack, then bundle adjacent products on top. Money movement will stay crowded, but the durable leaders will be the ones that pair borderless rails with enough compliance, liquidity, and software to become the standard toolset for fintech builders everywhere.