Home  >  Companies  >  Stripe
Stripe
API and software suite for accepting payments and managing online financial transactions

Revenue

$5.11B

2024

Valuation

$91.50B

2025

Funding

$9.81B

2025

Growth Rate (y/y)

28%

2025

Details
Headquarters
San Francisco, CA
CEO
Patrick Collison
Website
Milestones
FOUNDING YEAR
2010

Revenue

Sacra estimates that Stripe's revenue grew 34% to $5.12B in 2024, up from $3.82B in 2023, and returned to profitability for the full year with $101.9M in pre-tax profit versus a $1.2B pre-tax loss in 2023. These figures come from Stripe's Dublin-based unit, Stripe Payments International Holdings Ltd, which processes the majority of Stripe's global volume. Stripe confirmed it was profitable in 2024 and expects to remain profitable in 2025 and beyond.

Stripe reported total payment volume of $1.4T in 2024, up 38% year-over-year, demonstrating strong momentum in core payment processing. The company is now used by half of the Fortune 100.

Stripe's Revenue and Finance Automation Suite passed a $500M revenue run rate in February 2025, with Stripe Billing now used by 300,000+ companies managing nearly 200M active subscriptions.

Stripe's core checkout stack remains the growth engine, converting ~3% gross fees into a 0.40% net take-rate after interchange, network, and partner costs.

With court-mandated cracks in Apple's 30% commission on App Store purchases and Stripe's dominance in digital payments, $8-10B of incremental iOS GMV could be poised to migrate to Stripe in 2025.

Valuation & Funding

Stripe is arranging a new tender offer in February 2026 that would value the company at at least $140 billion, representing a gain of more than $30 billion from its most recent private valuation. The transaction is designed to provide liquidity to existing shareholders, and terms could still change.

Stripe's internal 409A valuation reached $106.7B in January 2026, used to set employee stock option prices and cited in reports about the company exploring share repurchases to provide investor liquidity without an IPO.

In September 2025, Stripe entered talks to repurchase shares from investors at a $106.7B valuation, representing a 17% increase from its prior official valuation and surpassing its 2021 peak of $95B.

Stripe last officially reached a valuation of $91.5B in February 2025 through a secondary tender offer for employees and early investors, nearly matching its 2021 peak of $95B. This valuation reflects a significant rebound from its $50B Series I round in March 2023. At the time of the February 2025 tender offer, Stripe confirmed it was profitable in 2024 and expected to remain profitable in 2025 and beyond.

The company has raised approximately $9.4B in total funding since its founding in 2010. Major investors include Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, Founders Fund, and Thrive Capital.

At its February 2025 valuation of $91.5B, Stripe is valued at approximately 17.9x its 2024 net revenue of $5.12B.

Product

Stripe is building an end-to-end platform for commerce on the internet. In addition to their core business around payments acceptance, Stripe also offers card issuing and banking-as-a-service (BaaS) via their new Treasury business. To deliver those services, Stripe partners with financial institutions like Wells Fargo, Cross River Bank, Regions Bank, Evolve Bank, Barclays, Goldman Sachs, and Citi. While those financial institutions provide the underlying infrastructure, Stripe builds products and services on top, like Terminal for in-person payments, Capital for lending-as-a-service, and Atlas for start-up incorporation.

Stripe has generally looked to grow their ecosystem by layering new products on top of their core payments API layer, for example:

Connect: for marketplaces and platforms to manage the movement of funds between different parties—for Uber, for example, which had a more complex use case than a conventional 1:1 ecommerce sale in needing to transfer payments between itself, riders, and drivers.

Billing: for subscription-based ecommerce companies to collect recurring payments from their users and manage different pricing models, competitive with Zuora and Chargebee. Stripe acquired Metronome for approximately $1 billion (closed January 2026) to add a streaming-first metering engine for usage-based billing, enabling Stripe to serve AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Databricks, and NVIDIA that need to ingest billions of raw usage events (API calls, token counts, inference durations) and aggregate them into billable metrics in real-time.

Issuing: for companies to issue virtual corporate cards with configurable spending limits and permissions as well as programmatically to generate cards as part of a product, like offering gig workers immediate access to earned funds via a card.

Lending: for SMBs using Stripe for payments, Stripe Lending allows those businesses to borrow cash, while Stripe can use their access to their financial data to price the risk of lending to them.

These and other products increase lock-in by expanding the range of services that Stripe users can access on the platform. Critically, they also increase the speed at which a new fintech company can get up and running and offering financial services to their own users.

With the consumerization and digitization of finance, it has become more and more normal for non-fintech apps to offer certain banking services to their users, whether in the form of virtual cards, lending, or other functions. Stripe's banking-as-a-service capabilities allow startups to offer these kinds of services out of the box. Lastly, staying within that Stripe ecosystem benefits companies by enabling them to build new kinds of products that wouldn't be possible without the range of services offered by Stripe.

For example, companies who issue cards using Stripe Issuing can give contractors and gig workers access to their earnings instantly via Stripe Treasury, enable individual users on their platform to issue their own cards using Connect, and manage spending limits and allowable merchant categories from the same Stripe dashboard where they manage the rest of their payments stack.

Crypto

Stripe has increasingly prioritized crypto as a strategic pillar, advancing stablecoin infrastructure and developer tooling across acquisitions, products, and new networks.

Stripe acquired Bridge for $1.1 billion (closed October 2024) and has applied through Bridge to the OCC for a national trust bank charter under the GENIUS Act. Bridge applied for a national trust bank charter in October 2025 to manage reserves and provide custody services under federal oversight, seeking to create Bridge National Trust Bank headquartered in New York City; the application has drawn opposition from advocacy and banking groups and would position Bridge alongside Circle, Paxos, Ripple, and Coinbase in pursuing federal banking licenses.

Stripe experienced early operational challenges with Bridge's rollout. In February 2026, Stripe tightened operational controls at Bridge after fraud and sanctions compliance issues emerged. Bridge paused a stablecoin-linked card program on January 19, 2026 after detecting suspicious users and fraud attempts; Bridge updated policies to prohibit customers in Venezuela and expanded its restricted-country list to include Afghanistan, Belarus, Sudan, and Yemen, while broadening restricted business categories to exclude weapons, tobacco, cannabis, jewelry, and luxury goods. Bridge relies on Lead Bank to process payments and issue cards.

Beyond Bridge, Stripe has advanced crypto infrastructure through strategic investments and protocol development. Tempo—the payments-focused blockchain co-developed by Stripe and Paradigm—raised a $500 million Series A at a $5 billion valuation, led by Thrive Capital and Greenoaks, with participation from Sequoia, Ribbit Capital, and SV Angel (closed October 2025); design partners include OpenAI, Shopify, and Visa. Stripe launched the Agentic Commerce Protocol in partnership with OpenAI and introduced its Open Issuance stablecoin platform (via Bridge) in September 2025, signalling a strategic pivot into AI-agent-enabled commerce and self-issued stablecoins.

Stripe has also expanded merchant acceptance of cryptocurrency payments. Stripe partnered with Crypto.com to enable direct crypto payments at Stripe-powered checkouts (launched January 2026). Crypto.com users can select Crypto.com Pay as a payment method, scan a QR code, and authorize transactions in the Crypto.com app using bitcoin, ether, stablecoins (USDC, PYUSD), and other cryptocurrencies; Stripe converts the crypto to the merchant's preferred local currency and deposits proceeds like other payments.

AI and agentic commerce

Stripe has positioned itself to capture AI-native commerce flows through partnerships and open protocols. OpenAI's ChatGPT now features Instant Checkout—powered by the open-sourced Agentic Commerce Protocol co-developed with Stripe—enabling U.S. users to buy directly from U.S. Etsy sellers (launched September 2025), with support for over a million Shopify merchants coming soon.

Stripe says ACP can be enabled with as little as "one line of code" for existing Stripe merchants, and also supports delegated payments and Stripe's Shared Payment Token API for non-Stripe processors.

Competition

In its core ecommerce payments provider business, Stripe competes with public companies like PayPal (Braintree), Adyen, Worldpay, Global Payments, and Fiserv (First Data), and privates like Revolut and Checkout.com.

Stripe already has international competitors that have geography-specific focus, like Adyen and Checkout.com in Europe. These regional rivals have benefited from heterogenous payments markets—whereas Stripe flourished in the U.S. where credit card acceptance rates are high, Adyen focused on supporting alternative payment methods from its inception, which helped it pick up adoption in Europe. Adyen and Checkout.com are also notable for building with a different type of go-to-market approach than Stripe. From launch, Adyen has had a focus on cross-border commerce, while Stripe has historically been more U.S.-focused with its product.

Checkout.com, on the other hand, has had more of mid-market, top-down focus. As of 2021, 3% of Stripe worked in sales, while a full 13% of Checkout.com worked in sales. It's likely that over time, we'll continue to see more and more companies emerge around the world to tackle payments in their specific geographies, especially given the relative lack of barriers to entry for well-funded competitors and the lack of network effects in the payments business.

In November 2025, Adyen said it expects net revenue growth of about 20% annually after 2026. The company highlighted expansion with existing customers and new wins across enterprise, in‑store, and platforms, and targets EBITDA margin above 55% by 2028.

Stripe's biggest threat on the ecosystem side is two-fold: there's the risk of new players emerging, breaking off pieces of Stripe's business and doing them better, and there's the longer-term risk that a more modularized, primitives-centered approach is going to be better at facilitating the next biggest fintech-related consumer experiences.

Today, companies getting traction going after individual slices of Stripe's business include:

  • Card issuing: Lithic, Highnote, and Apto Payments
  • Taxes: Anrok
    • Corporate cards: Ramp and Brex
    • Payment facilitation: Finix
    • These companies are indexing on interoperability and trying to build a sustainable ecosystem of products that sit outside Stripe.

      Lithic, for example, has partner programs with Canopy (lending), Sila (ACH), Wyre (crypto), Dwolla (payments), and Peach (lending). Between them, they share documentation and support to help users get up and running stitching these different fintechs together in their product.

      What they're betting on, fundamentally, is that this kind of modularized approach with many different "best-in-class" point solution providers is going to capture many of the best and fastest growing companies in the future—simply because they can enable novel product experiences where platforms like Stripe look to help companies with repeatable playbooks.

      Usage-based billing

      In usage-based billing, companies going after Stripe include Orb ($44M raised, Menlo Ventures), Lago ($34M raised, FirstMark), and Sequence ($19M raised, A16Z), but the Metronome acquisition positions Stripe to displace these independents by vertically integrating metering with payments, the same strategy it used against Zuora and Chargebee in subscription billing.

TAM Expansion

Stripe has a few core expansion opportunities: 1) market growth via international expansion, 2) growth of ecosystem around payments, 3) disrupting existing payments infrastructure.

International

NoneNone

Around 5 out of 6 new internet users come from outside of Western Europe and North America, which means that emerging markets present a significant growth opportunity for Stripe’s acquiring business—both in terms of merchants who need to be able to accept payments and customers who want to make online purchases.

Internationally, Stripe competes with companies like Adyen ($ADYEY), Checkout, and Tencent’s WeChat ($TCEHY).

Today, Stripe operates in 46 countries, which is more than Adyen, and roughly at parity with major global payments processors like Fiserv, Global Payments, and FIS.

Some of Stripe’s international expansion will come through acquisitions. In 2020, Stripe acquired the Nigerian fintech startup Paystack—and its 60,000 customers—as part of a bigger move into the African continent.

Also in 2020, Stripe led the Series A for the Philippine digital payments business PayMongo, which only launched in 2019 with the goal of bringing more businesses in the Philippines online.

Overall, by acquiring or building their way into other markets internationally, Stripe can grow their customer base and drive increased revenue.

Ecosystem

If Stripe continues on their current trajectory in terms of building out additional use cases like billing, invoicing, and subscription management in the finance back-office, they have the opportunity to further grow their average revenue per customer and develop a stickier product through better lock-in.

That expansion could include use cases like:

  • Tax: Today, in most parts of the world, Stripe Tax calculates how much you owe—but the opportunity remains for Stripe to build or buy its way into competition with end-to-end tax management SaaS like Avalara
    • Subscription management: While Stripe offers subscription management via their Billing product, standalone products like Chargebee offer more fine-grained control via things like customized prices
    • Expense management: Like Brex, Ramp, and Expensify, Stripe could make it easier for companies to monitor and manage their internal spend, particularly in combination with their Issuing product
    • Stripe has advantages due to the ecosystem they’ve already built that could make this a powerful avenue of future growth. Since new products in tax or expense management could integrate with a customer’s existing use of Stripe for billing or a corporate card, using Stripe as an end-to-end finance back-office platform could provide significant efficiencies for users.

      Infrastructure

      None

      Today, Stripe operates as an “open loop” network (pictured), named that because it relies on existing financial infrastructure (like Visa and Mastercard) rather than attempting to replace it. Every bank issuer and bank merchant on those networks can send payments through Stripe, and Stripe benefits from levying a small tax on that entire long tail of activity.

      There is, however, a growth case where Stripe looks to transition itself into a “closed-loop” network and directly challenge Visa and Mastercard in an effort to build the “5th” network (after Visa, Mastercard, Discover and American Express) which would enable them to capture, interchange, and deliver even more compelling unit economics for their merchants.

      Building a closed-loop network would imply putting together a system that handles every transaction step in between the consumer and merchant. PayPal is the best example of this kind of online, closed loop in the United States—though they do integrate with other parties, you have the ability to deposit money into PayPal and transfer those funds elsewhere solely through PayPal.

      The upshot is far better unit economics. If a customer pays for something from a Block Seller using a credit card, Block concedes 3% of the purchase price to the credit card company processing the transaction. On the other hand, if they can simply take Cash App as the method of payment for every transaction on the platform, they would be able to significantly increase their take rate.

      One of the core challenges with building a closed-loop network is that it requires acquiring both merchants and consumers. PayPal’s acquisitions of Braintree (B2B) and Venmo (B2C) helped them build their network, while Block’s Cash App (B2C) and support for Sellers (B2B) have done the same.

      Stripe, today, has no consumer offering. However, with their Issuing product, they are moving into the direction of trying to capture both sides of the transaction, albeit in a strictly B2B sense. However, Stripe could look to acquire a consumer player much in the same way that PayPal acquired Venmo, and use that as a foothold into putting together their own closed-loop network.

Risks

Bank partner dependency: Stripe relies on partner banks like Wells Fargo, Cross River, and Evolve for BaaS infrastructure, and Bridge depends on Lead Bank for card issuance and payment processing. Wells Fargo exited BIN sponsorship in 2024, and regulatory scrutiny of fintech-bank partnerships could constrain Stripe's ability to launch products or force costly migrations to new banking partners.

Stablecoin compliance exposure: Bridge's early rollouts drew sanctions compliance questions and fraud, forcing a card program pause in January 2026 and tightened country/merchant restrictions. Ties to clients with Venezuela-linked activity and ongoing OCC charter opposition from advocacy groups create regulatory risk that could limit Bridge's cross-border payments expansion or trigger enforcement action.

Modular ecosystem threat: Point solutions like Lithic (issuing), Anrok (tax), and Orb (usage billing) are building interoperable ecosystems betting that best-in-class primitives will capture high-growth companies seeking novel product experiences. If developers prefer composable stacks over Stripe's integrated platform, Stripe could lose share in emerging use cases despite its scale advantages.

News

DISCLAIMERS

This report is for information purposes only and is not to be used or considered as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or to buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. Nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal trade recommendation to you.

This research report has been prepared solely by Sacra and should not be considered a product of any person or entity that makes such report available, if any.

Information and opinions presented in the sections of the report were obtained or derived from sources Sacra believes are reliable, but Sacra makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. Information, opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect a determination at its original date of publication by Sacra and are subject to change without notice.

Sacra accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of the material presented in this report, except that this exclusion of liability does not apply to the extent that liability arises under specific statutes or regulations applicable to Sacra. Sacra may have issued, and may in the future issue, other reports that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Those reports reflect different assumptions, views and analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them and Sacra is under no obligation to ensure that such other reports are brought to the attention of any recipient of this report.

All rights reserved. All material presented in this report, unless specifically indicated otherwise is under copyright to Sacra. Sacra reserves any and all intellectual property rights in the report. All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this report are trademarks or service marks or registered trademarks or service marks of Sacra. Any modification, copying, displaying, distributing, transmitting, publishing, licensing, creating derivative works from, or selling any report is strictly prohibited. None of the material, nor its content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed to any other party, without the prior express written permission of Sacra. Any unauthorized duplication, redistribution or disclosure of this report will result in prosecution.