Home  >  Companies  >  Linear
Linear
Issue tracking and project management tool for software development teams to streamline workflows and enhance productivity

Valuation

$1.25B

2025

Funding

$134.20M

2025

View PDF
Details
Headquarters
San Francisco, CA
CEO
Karri Saarinen
Website
Milestones
FOUNDING YEAR
2019
Listed In

Valuation

Linear closed an $82 million Series C in June 2025 at a $1.25 billion valuation, led by Accel with participation from existing investors Sequoia Capital, 01 Advisors, Seven Seven Six, Designer Fund, and Index Ventures.

The company previously raised a $35 million Series B led by Accel in September 2023, following a $13 million Series A from Sequoia Capital in December 2020. Linear's initial funding came from a $4.2 million seed round led by Sequoia in November 2019.

In total, Linear has raised $134.2 million across all funding rounds, with Accel and Sequoia serving as the primary institutional backers throughout the company's growth trajectory.

Product

Linear is a fast, opinionated issue-tracking tool built specifically for software development teams. The product runs on Linear's proprietary Sync Engine, an offline-first data layer that makes every interaction feel instantaneous even on poor internet connections.

The interface centers on three core primitives: Issues for individual tasks, Projects for longer initiatives, and Initiatives for company-level objectives. Teams typically start by ingesting work items through GitHub commits, Slack messages, email, or Linear's Triage queue that handles incoming requests.

Users then clarify and label issues using slash commands or the command menu, attaching Figma links and setting priorities. Work gets organized into weekly Cycles, longer Projects, and company-level Initiatives, with a Timeline view showing Gantt-style progress bars for cross-team coordination.

Linear automates status updates through GitHub and GitLab pull request integrations, rolling completed work into progress charts and analytics dashboards.

The platform includes AI features like Product Intelligence, which automatically routes and de-duplicates incoming issues, and Linear for Agents, which lets AI systems like coding assistants become first-class users that can be assigned tasks and provide status updates.

Linear Asks extends the platform beyond developers by letting anyone in Slack or email file requests without a Linear account, automatically converting messages into tracked issues while keeping conversations synchronized.

Business Model

Linear operates a subscription SaaS business with usage expanding through team growth and feature adoption rather than complex customization or professional services.

The company follows a product-led growth model where teams can start using Linear immediately without lengthy sales cycles or implementation projects. This approach keeps customer acquisition costs low while enabling rapid organic expansion within organizations.

Linear's pricing scales with team size and feature requirements rather than usage volume, creating predictable revenue streams as customers grow. The Business and Enterprise tiers unlock AI-powered automation and analytics features that command higher price points while reducing manual work for customers.

The platform integrates deeply with existing developer tools like GitHub, GitLab, Slack, and Figma, making it sticky once adopted since it becomes central to daily workflows. This integration strategy also reduces switching costs and creates network effects as more team members join.

Linear maintains healthy gross margins by focusing on software rather than data licensing or professional services. The company's emphasis on speed and simplicity keeps development costs controlled while enabling rapid feature iteration based on user feedback.

Competition

Vertically integrated DevOps platforms

Atlassian dominates this category with Jira serving over 300,000 customers as part of a broader DevOps toolkit. Atlassian leverages its massive install base and extensive customization options while adding AI features through Atlassian Intelligence and strategic acquisitions like the $1 billion DX purchase.

GitHub Issues and Projects compete by keeping work management directly in code repositories, leveraging Copilot AI context and tight integration with development workflows. However, Microsoft's focus on migrating GitHub infrastructure to Azure has created potential feature development delays.

Azure DevOps Boards targets enterprise customers with legacy requirements, bridging traditional project management with modern development tools through integrations with GitHub Copilot and other Microsoft services.

Horizontal work management suites

ClickUp pursues an all-in-one strategy, expanding from general project management into engineering use cases through Git integrations and AI agents. The platform positions itself as a single license that finance and HR teams already use, creating procurement advantages.

Notion and monday.com similarly target engineering teams as an expansion from their core knowledge management and work management platforms, emphasizing unified workflows across departments rather than developer-specific optimization.

Developer-first challengers

Shortcut, Height, and other specialized tools compete directly with Linear on speed and developer experience. These platforms differentiate through keyboard-first interfaces, opinionated workflows, and AI features designed specifically for coding workflows rather than general business processes.

This category focuses on winning developers through superior user experience and workflow efficiency, often at the expense of the extensive customization options that enterprise buyers traditionally demand.

TAM Expansion

AI-native workflow automation

Product Intelligence represents Linear's expansion into workflow automation budgets that Jira and Asana currently capture through expensive plugins. Auto-routing and de-duplication features let Linear charge premium prices for Business and Enterprise tiers while reducing manual work for high-volume teams.

Issue discussion summaries and AI-powered project updates position Linear as a knowledge management system rather than just task tracking, enabling expansion into documentation and communication budgets that teams currently spend on separate tools.

Linear for Agents creates entirely new use cases by letting AI systems become first-class users, opening opportunities to charge for AI agent seats and premium automation features as coding assistants become more capable.

Customer base expansion beyond developers

Linear Asks and deep Slack integrations shift the platform from pure developer tooling into shared service desks for customer experience, sales operations, and HR requests. Each new internal function can multiply ARR within existing customers without additional acquisition costs.

Enterprise features like Issue SLAs, granular permissions, and SOC2 compliance enable Linear to compete for Fortune 2000 accounts currently locked into Atlassian ecosystems, representing significantly higher contract values than startup customers.

The Timeline view and Initiative tracking provide portfolio-level visibility that traditional project portfolio management tools charge premium prices for, expanding Linear's addressable market to include PMOs and CTO offices managing OKRs at enterprise scale.

Geographic and vertical expansion

North America represents only 39% of global project management software spending, with APAC and Latin America growing over 10% annually. Localizing billing, adding data residency options, and partnering with regional system integrators could tap high-growth markets where Jira currently dominates by default.

Linear Insights analytics capabilities create opportunities to expand into finance and growth analytics budgets currently going to business intelligence tools, leveraging the operational data already flowing through Linear's platform.

Risks

Platform consolidation: Major cloud providers and DevOps platforms are vertically integrating issue tracking into broader toolchains, potentially making standalone tools like Linear default add-ons rather than primary purchasing decisions. Microsoft's GitHub ecosystem and Atlassian's comprehensive DevOps suite create procurement advantages that pure-play tools struggle to overcome.

Enterprise complexity demands: Linear's opinionated simplicity that drives developer adoption may limit expansion into large enterprise accounts that require extensive customization, complex approval workflows, and integration with legacy systems. The company's design philosophy of keeping only three core primitives could become a constraint as it pursues higher-value enterprise contracts.

AI commoditization: As AI-powered automation becomes standard across all project management tools, Linear's current AI differentiation may erode quickly. Larger competitors with more resources and data can potentially offer superior AI features while bundling them into existing enterprise relationships, reducing Linear's ability to command premium pricing for intelligent workflow automation.

DISCLAIMERS

This report is for information purposes only and is not to be used or considered as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or to buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. Nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal trade recommendation to you.

This research report has been prepared solely by Sacra and should not be considered a product of any person or entity that makes such report available, if any.

Information and opinions presented in the sections of the report were obtained or derived from sources Sacra believes are reliable, but Sacra makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. Information, opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect a determination at its original date of publication by Sacra and are subject to change without notice.

Sacra accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of the material presented in this report, except that this exclusion of liability does not apply to the extent that liability arises under specific statutes or regulations applicable to Sacra. Sacra may have issued, and may in the future issue, other reports that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Those reports reflect different assumptions, views and analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them and Sacra is under no obligation to ensure that such other reports are brought to the attention of any recipient of this report.

All rights reserved. All material presented in this report, unless specifically indicated otherwise is under copyright to Sacra. Sacra reserves any and all intellectual property rights in the report. All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this report are trademarks or service marks or registered trademarks or service marks of Sacra. Any modification, copying, displaying, distributing, transmitting, publishing, licensing, creating derivative works from, or selling any report is strictly prohibited. None of the material, nor its content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed to any other party, without the prior express written permission of Sacra. Any unauthorized duplication, redistribution or disclosure of this report will result in prosecution.